Deterministic Corda Modules¶
A Corda contract’s verify function should always produce the same results for the same input data. To that end, Corda provides the following modules:
core-deterministicserialization-deterministicjdk8u-deterministic
These are reduced version of Corda’s core and serialization modules and the OpenJDK 8 rt.jar, where the
non-deterministic functionality has been removed. The intention here is that all CorDapp classes required for
contract verification should be compiled against these modules to prevent them containing non-deterministic behaviour.
注解
These modules are only a development aid. They cannot guarantee determinism without also including
deterministic versions of all their dependent libraries, e.g. kotlin-stdlib.
Generating the Deterministic Modules¶
- JDK 8
jdk8u-deterministicis a “pseudo JDK” image that we can point the Java and Kotlin compilers to. It downloads thert.jarcontaining a deterministic subset of the Java 8 APIs from the Artifactory.To build a new version of this JAR and upload it to the Artifactory, see the
create-jdk8umodule. This is a standalone Gradle project within the Corda repository that will clone thedeterministic-jvm8branch of Corda’s OpenJDK repository and then build it. (This currently requires a C++ compiler, GNU Make and a UNIX-like development environment.)- Corda Modules
core-deterministicandserialization-deterministicare generated from Corda’scoreandserializationmodules respectively using both ProGuard and Corda’sJarFilterGradle plugin. Corda developers configure these tools by applying Corda’s@KeepForDJVMand@DeleteForDJVMannotations to elements ofcoreandserializationas described here.
The build generates each of Corda’s deterministic JARs in six steps:
Some very few classes in the original JAR must be replaced completely. This is typically because the original class uses something like
ThreadLocal, which is not available in the deterministic Java APIs, and yet the class is still required by the deterministic JAR. We must keep such classes to a minimum!The patched JAR is analysed by ProGuard for the first time using the following rule:
keep '@interface net.corda.core.KeepForDJVM { *; }'ProGuard works by calculating how much code is reachable from given “entry points”, and in our case these entry points are the
@KeepForDJVMclasses. The unreachable classes are then discarded by ProGuard’sshrinkoption.The remaining classes may still contain non-deterministic code. However, there is no way of writing a ProGuard rule explicitly to discard anything. Consider the following class:
@CordaSerializable @KeepForDJVM data class UniqueIdentifier @JvmOverloads @DeleteForDJVM constructor( val externalId: String? = null, val id: UUID = UUID.randomUUID() ) : Comparable<UniqueIdentifier> { ... }While CorDapps will definitely need to handle
UniqueIdentifierobjects, all of the secondary constructors generate a new randomUUIDand so are non-deterministic. Hence the next “determinising” step is to pass the classes to theJarFiltertool, which strips out all of the elements which have been annotated as@DeleteForDJVMand stubs out any functions annotated with@StubOutForDJVM. (Stub functions that return a value will throwUnsupportedOperationException, whereasvoidorUnitstubs will do nothing.)After the
@DeleteForDJVMelements have been filtered out, the classes are rescanned using ProGuard to remove any more code that has now become unreachable.The remaining classes define our deterministic subset. However, the
@kotlin.Metadataannotations on the compiled Kotlin classes still contain references to all of the functions and properties that ProGuard has deleted. Therefore we now use theJarFilterto delete these references, as otherwise the Kotlin compiler will pretend that the deleted functions and properties are still present.Finally, we use ProGuard again to validate our JAR against the deterministic
rt.jar:This step will fail if ProGuard spots any Java API references that still cannot be satisfied by the deterministic
rt.jar, and hence it will break the build.
Configuring IntelliJ with a Deterministic SDK¶
We would like to configure IntelliJ so that it will highlight uses of non-deterministic Java APIs as not found.
Or, more specifically, we would like IntelliJ to use the deterministic-rt.jar as a “Module SDK” for deterministic
modules rather than the rt.jar from the default project SDK, to make IntelliJ consistent with Gradle.
This is possible, but slightly tricky to configure because IntelliJ will not recognise an SDK containing only the
deterministic-rt.jar as being valid. It also requires that IntelliJ delegate all build tasks to Gradle, and that
Gradle be configured to use the Project’s SDK.
- Creating the Deterministic SDK
Gradle creates a suitable JDK image in the project’s
jdk8u-deterministic/jdkdirectory, and you can configure IntelliJ to use this location for this SDK. However, you should also be aware that IntelliJ SDKs are available for all projects to use.To create this JDK image, execute the following:
$ gradlew jdk8u-deterministic:copyJdk
Now select
File/Project Structure/Platform Settings/SDKsand add a new JDK SDK with thejdk8u-deterministic/jdkdirectory as its home. Rename this SDK to something like “1.8 (Deterministic)”.This should be sufficient for IntelliJ. However, if IntelliJ realises that this SDK does not contain a full JDK then you will need to configure the new SDK by hand:
Create a JDK Home directory with the following contents:
jre/lib/rt.jarwhere
rt.jarhere is this renamed artifact:<dependency> <groupId>net.corda</groupId> <artifactId>deterministic-rt</artifactId> <classifier>api</classifier> </dependency>
While IntelliJ is not running, locate the
config/options/jdk.table.xmlfile in IntelliJ’s configuration directory. Add an empty<jdk>section to this file:<jdk version="2"> <name value="1.8 (Deterministic)"/> <type value="JavaSDK"/> <version value="java version "1.8.0""/> <homePath value=".. path to the deterministic JDK directory .."/> <roots> </roots> </jdk>
Open IntelliJ and select
File/Project Structure/Platform Settings/SDKs. The “1.8 (Deterministic)” SDK should now be present. Select it and then click on theClasspathtab. Press the “Add” / “Plus” button to addrt.jarto the SDK’s classpath. Then select theAnnotationstab and include the same JAR(s) as the other SDKs.
- Configuring the Corda Project
Open the root
build.gradlefile and define this property:buildscript { ext { ... deterministic_idea_sdk = '1.8 (Deterministic)' ... } }
- Configuring IntelliJ
Go to
File/Settings/Build, Execution, Deployment/Build Tools/Gradle, and configure Gradle’s JVM to be the project’s JVM.Go to
File/Settings/Build, Execution, Deployment/Build Tools/Gradle/Runner, and select these options:- Delegate IDE build/run action to Gradle
- Run tests using the Gradle Test Runner
Delete all of the
outdirectories that IntelliJ has previously generated for each module.Go to
View/Tool Windows/Gradleand click theRefresh all Gradle projectsbutton.
These steps will enable IntelliJ’s presentation compiler to use the deterministic rt.jar with the following modules:
core-deterministicserialization-deterministiccore-deterministic:testing:common
but still build everything using Gradle with the full JDK.
Testing the Deterministic Modules¶
The core-deterministic:testing module executes some basic JUnit tests for the core-deterministic and
serialization-deterministic JARs. These tests are compiled against the deterministic rt.jar, although
they are still executed using the full JDK.
The testing module also has two sub-modules:
core-deterministic:testing:data- This module generates test data such as serialised transactions and elliptic curve key pairs using the full
non-deterministic
corelibrary and JDK. This data is all written into a single JAR which thetestingmodule adds to its classpath. core-deterministic:testing:common- This module provides the test classes which the
testinganddatamodules need to share. It is therefore compiled against the deterministic API subset.
Applying @KeepForDJVM and @DeleteForDJVM annotations¶
Corda developers need to understand how to annotate classes in the core and serialization modules correctly
in order to maintain the deterministic JARs.
注解
Every Kotlin class still has its own .class file, even when all of those classes share the same
source file. Also, annotating the file:
@file:KeepForDJVM
package net.corda.core.internal
does not automatically annotate any class declared within this file. It merely annotates any
accompanying Kotlin xxxKt class.
For more information about how JarFilter is processing the byte-code inside core and serialization,
use Gradle’s --info or --debug command-line options.
- Deterministic Classes
Classes that must be included in the deterministic JAR should be annotated as
@KeepForDJVM.@Target(FILE, CLASS) @Retention(BINARY) @CordaInternal annotation class KeepForDJVM
To preserve any Kotlin functions, properties or type aliases that have been declared outside of a
class, you should annotate the source file’spackagedeclaration instead:@file:JvmName("InternalUtils") @file:KeepForDJVM package net.corda.core.internal infix fun Temporal.until(endExclusive: Temporal): Duration = Duration.between(this, endExclusive)
- Non-Deterministic Elements
Elements that must be deleted from classes in the deterministic JAR should be annotated as
@DeleteForDJVM.@Target( FILE, CLASS, CONSTRUCTOR, FUNCTION, PROPERTY_GETTER, PROPERTY_SETTER, PROPERTY, FIELD, TYPEALIAS ) @Retention(BINARY) @CordaInternal annotation class DeleteForDJVM
You must also ensure that a deterministic class’s primary constructor does not reference any classes that are not available in the deterministic
rt.jar. The biggest risk here would be thatJarFilterwould delete the primary constructor and that the class could no longer be instantiated, althoughJarFilterwill print a warning in this case. However, it is also likely that the “determinised” class would have a different serialisation signature than its non-deterministic version and so become unserialisable on the deterministic JVM.Primary constructors that have non-deterministic default parameter values must still be annotated as
@DeleteForDJVMbecause they cannot be refactored without breaking Corda’s binary interface. The Kotlin compiler will automatically apply this@DeleteForDJVMannotation - along with any others - to all of the class’s secondary constructors too. TheJarFilterplugin can then remove the@DeleteForDJVMannotation from the primary constructor so that it can subsequently delete only the secondary constructors.The annotations that
JarFilterwill “sanitise” from primary constructors in this way are listed in the plugin’s configuration block, e.g.task jarFilter(type: JarFilterTask) { ... annotations { ... forSanitise = [ "net.corda.core.DeleteForDJVM" ] } }
Be aware that package-scoped Kotlin properties are all initialised within a common
<clinit>block inside their host.classfile. This means that whenJarFilterdeletes these properties, it cannot also remove their initialisation code. For example:package net.corda.core @DeleteForDJVM val map: MutableMap<String, String> = ConcurrentHashMap()
In this case,
JarFilterwould delete themapproperty but the<clinit>block would still create an instance ofConcurrentHashMap. The solution here is to refactor the property into its own file and then annotate the file itself as@DeleteForDJVMinstead.- Non-Deterministic Function Stubs
Sometimes it is impossible to delete a function entirely. Or a function may have some non-deterministic code embedded inside it that cannot be removed. For these rare cases, there is the
@StubOutForDJVMannotation:@Target( CONSTRUCTOR, FUNCTION, PROPERTY_GETTER, PROPERTY_SETTER ) @Retention(BINARY) @CordaInternal annotation class StubOutForDJVM
This annotation instructs
JarFilterto replace the function’s body with either an empty body (for functions that returnvoidorUnit) or one that throwsUnsupportedOperationException. For example:fun necessaryCode() { nonDeterministicOperations() otherOperations() } @StubOutForDJVM private fun nonDeterministicOperations() { // etc }